Guaranteed Higher Grade!
Free Quote
November 13, 2024
Subject: Efficacy of Documentation in Facilitating Social Transformation
The document is named, Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, S.O. 1993, c. 28. The title suggests that the paper was produced in 1993. The most recent modification occurred in August 2020. Considering this information, a grade of A is appropriate, given the title, date, and modification date are all included (Ontario.ca, 2022).
The Ontario government established the document named, Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, S.O. 1993, c. 28, to enhance public awareness of the need of safeguarding ecological biodiversity and to encourage participation in the preservation, conservation, and restoration of the natural environment. A Grade A is warranted, since the paper is published on the Ontario government website, explicitly articulating the objective of fostering public awareness about the need of maintaining, conserving, and restoring ecological biodiversity (Ontario.ca, 2022).
The Environment Bill of Rights, 1993, S.O. 1993, c. 28 is relevant to the residents of Ontario, Canada on their role in preserving biological variety. The document is also relevant to the government, which, in accordance with Her Majesty's guidance and the Legislative Assembly's consent, must assume primary responsibility for achieving the objective of protecting, preserving, and restoring ecological biodiversity (Ontario.ca, 2022). Grade B is assigned to the document's application aspect, indicating it is acceptable; nevertheless, enhancements might be made to globalize the endeavor. This is due to the potential applicability of the text for individuals from other nations.
The Environment Bill of Rights document intends to:
Considering these objectives, grade A is appropriate, since it clearly articulates the intent of safeguarding the natural environment.
Documents such as the Environment Bill of Rights, proposed by the government in response to Legislative Assembly motions, are enacted in the public interest. The objective is to inform the public about the ongoing campaigns and initiatives designed to provide them with an improved living environment. Upon the approval of the papers, the public is anticipated to adhere to the stipulated expectations, resulting in favorable results. Nationally, the majority of individuals adhere to the expectation, with notable exceptions. The outliers are those who disregard the need of safeguarding or conserving natural resources for future generations. They utilize resources beyond their requirements, leading to resource depletion. Despite several promotional initiatives, these demographics fail to comprehend the larger implications (Doelle & Sinclair, 2019). They exhibit selfishness by consistently using readily accessible resources. The consequences of this approach are apparent in the lifestyle of the impoverished segments of society, who are experiencing a life of deficiencies. Flora and animals are also casualties, as individuals are down trees for personal gain and polluting the beaches, despite the presence of waste receptacles. Benidickson (2020) contends that government-initiated social change effectively raises public awareness regarding imminent environmental threats that will manifest more broadly if exploitations are not promptly curtailed. The Environment Bill of Rights represents a significant advancement in this area.
The protection and preservation of the natural environment are reinforced by the enactment of Environment Bills of Rights (Sumudu & Andrea, 2019). Defining the objectives and rationale for safeguarding, conserving, and rehabilitating environmental integrity, while ensuring sustainable development and upholding fundamental rights to a healthy environment, enhances the trajectory towards effectuating social change in environmental stewardship (Clément, 2018). The document form of the Environment Bill of Rights, available on the Ontario government website, reflects collaborative efforts to restore the environmental integrity diminished by global warming, pollution, and other factors. Individuals visiting the website may learn about the measures implemented by the Commissioner to safeguard ecological biodiversity. By understanding governmental strategies, individuals may proactively use resources judiciously (Miron, 2018). If individuals are aware of the need of safeguarding and maintaining natural resources, it may effectively guide the pursuit of social change. Focusing on individuals in rural regions, particularly over access to fundamental natural resources, would validate the Environment Bill of Rights (Energy.gov, 2013). Ensuring access would promote equitable distribution of resources based on the needs, desires, and requirements of individuals.
The revision of the document, Environment Bill of Rights, and its presentation on the internet is very successful in supporting its aim or objective. The more the public awareness of trends aimed at maintaining ecological biodiversity, the more efforts will be made to provide sufficient resources for future generations. The involvement of individuals is essential for beginning effective social change and promoting the public good, hence enhancing the livability of the planet (Cela.ca, 2022). This method would guarantee decorum, harmony, and tranquility. Advertising initiatives on social networking platforms would effectively raise awareness about methods for protecting and preserving the natural environment.
According on the aforementioned study, the following report card may be developed for the Environment Bill of Rights by the Ontario government, Canada:
| Category | Grade | Justification (based on research | APA referencing | ||
| Potential of the document to improve quality of life and encourage social change | A | Clarity in goal towards making the people realize the value of protecting, conserving and restoring the ecological biodiversity of the environment | Ontario.ca (2022). Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, S.O. 1993, c. 28. Retrieved 16th Jan 2022 from https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/93e28 | ||
|
B | Based on the research, the grade is justified, as the people who have access to the bill practice actions related to conserving, protecting and restoring the ecological biodiversity of the environment. | Clément, D. (2018). Human rights or social justice? The problem of rights inflation. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(2), 155-169. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1349245] | ||
|
A | In view of the purposes, grade A is apt, as there is clarity in the purpose, completing the thoughts of protecting the natural environment. | Cela.ca (2022). Law Reform: Ontario's Environmental Bill of Rights. Retrieved 16th Jan 2022 from https://cela.ca/law-reform-ontarios-environmental-bill-of-rights/ | ||
| Compliance with the expectations and suggestions in terms of practice and ignorance | B | Nationally, most of the people are following the expectation, except some. The exceptions are those who do not pay heed to the need for protecting or preserving the natural resources for the future generation. They exploit the resources beyond their needs, which has resulted in depletion of the resources. In spite of several advertising campaigns, these sections of people fail to realize the consequences on a broader context, which is felt in the form of dearth of natural resources, pollution related deaths, poverty, malnutrition and others | Doelle, M., & Sinclair, A. J. (2019). The new IAA in Canada: From revolutionary thoughts to reality. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 79, 106292. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106292] | ||
| Need for improvements | B | On the assertions and propositions made in the research, it could be stated that Grade B is awarded to the aspect of application of the document, as it is satisfactory, but improvements could be made in terms of globalizing the initiative. This is because the document could be made applicable for the people of other countries. | Miron, I. (2018). The importance of Ontario’s Environmental Bill of Rights: What you need to know. [online] Available at: https://ecojustice.ca/the-importance-of-ontarios-environmental-bill-of-rights-what-you-need-to-know/ [Accessed on 16th Jan 2022] |
Benidickson, J. (2020). Environmental Law in Canada. Kluwer Law International BV. [https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dfDSDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT11&dq=environment+bill+of+rights+canada&ots=rPoEXPfpJu&sig=LJ0exTnpTKEn1KSqOZLfCvEkq_o#v=onepage&q=environment%20bill%20of%20rights%20canada&f=false]
Cela.ca (2022). Law Reform: Ontario's Environmental Bill of Rights. Retrieved 16th Jan 2022 from https://cela.ca/law-reform-ontarios-environmental-bill-of-rights/
Clément, D. (2018). Human rights or social justice? The problem of rights inflation. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(2), 155-169. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1349245]
Doelle, M., & Sinclair, A. J. (2019). The new IAA in Canada: From revolutionary thoughts to reality. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 79, 106292. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106292]
Energy.gov (2013). Ontario’s Environmental Bill of Rights and You. Retrieved 16th Jan 2022 from https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/06/f22/OEBRG.pdf
Miron, I. (2018). The importance of Ontario’s Environmental Bill of Rights: What you need to know. [online] Available at: https://ecojustice.ca/the-importance-of-ontarios-environmental-bill-of-rights-what-you-need-to-know/ [Accessed on 16th Jan 2022]
Ontario.ca (2022). Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, S.O. 1993, c. 28. Retrieved 16th Jan 2022 from https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/93e28
Sumudu, A., & Andrea, S. (2019). Human rights and the environment: key issues. Routledge. [https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315193397/human-rights-environment-atapattu-sumudu-schapper-andrea]
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
Order Now
